Timeline for Exponentials in the opposite category of finite separable algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2013 at 0:32 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | @FujitaTomomi CW stands for Community Wiki; see here for instance: mathoverflow.net/help/privileges/edit-community-wiki You don't have to do anything for it except ask a moderator for it when you want it. We use them at MO mostly for 'soft' questions that are of community interest but do not have a definitive answer. For example, questions that ask for advice pertaining to careers in mathematics. | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 21:39 | comment | added | Fujita Tomomi | Sorry, I don't understand about CW. What is it? What I have to do for it? | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 18:21 | comment | added | Paul Taylor | As you see I have given a template for a community wiki answer below, although presumably we need to work from Marguax's answer now. | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 18:16 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Paul cannot make this CW himself (only mods can do that now, alas), but if he flags for CW, a mod can make it so. But it's only if he wants (CW answers do not result in gains or losses of rep). | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 14:18 | comment | added | David White | @PaulTaylor: If you make your answer CW then Fujita can edit directly into it. The CW option is sadly under-utilized, but it seems like a good way to get people from these different fields to be able to cobble together a meaningful answer in one place. | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 14:07 | comment | added | Paul Taylor | You have asked a difficult question whose solution (if there is one) will require collaboration between people from different disciplines (commutative algebra and models of linear logic), which makes it a good question for MathOverflow. In the first instance, both sides will need to offer and accept ideas without worrying about rigour. Can you fill in some of the obvious gaps in my argument? | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 13:48 | comment | added | Fujita Tomomi | Thank you for your interesting observation and short summary of the strategy. However, $K[X]$ is not finite separable over $K$. Doesn't it matter? | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 12:49 | history | answered | Paul Taylor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |