Timeline for Let $f \in S(\mathbb R)$. Can we say $\widehat{|f|} \in L^{1}(\mathbb R)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 18, 2013 at 13:10 | comment | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | Oops! I forgot that $f$ is a one-variable function. $(1+|\xi|^2)^{-1/2}$ is not in $L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$ if $n\geq 2$. | |
Nov 18, 2013 at 5:27 | vote | accept | Inquisitive | ||
Nov 17, 2013 at 16:51 | comment | added | Michael Renardy | It is more elementary than you think. If f is in S, it is Lipschitz continuous. It is then easy to prove that |f| is also Lipschitz continuous, and therefore in $H^1$. | |
Nov 17, 2013 at 8:20 | comment | added | Inquisitive | Let $f\in S(\mathbb R)$ such that $|f|\not \in S(\mathbb R)$; (so $\widehat {|f|} \in L^{2}(\mathbb R)$ by Plancherel theorem). But why $(1+|\xi|^{2})^{\frac {1}{2}}\widehat {|f|} \in \mathbb L^{2}(\mathbb R) ?$ | |
Nov 16, 2013 at 16:54 | comment | added | abx | Because $(1+\xi ^2)^{-\frac{1}{2} }$ is in $L^2$, and the product of two functions of $L^2$ is in $L^1$. | |
Nov 16, 2013 at 16:28 | comment | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | $g\in H^1\Longleftrightarrow (1+|\xi|^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\widehat{g}(\xi)\in L^2$. Why does the last condition imply that $\widehat{g}\in L^1$? | |
Nov 16, 2013 at 11:48 | history | answered | Michael Renardy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |