Timeline for What would a "moral" proof of the Weil Conjectures require?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 17, 2017 at 6:13 | history | suggested | Ascenso |
Added motives tag
|
|
| Apr 17, 2017 at 3:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 17, 2017 at 6:13 | |||||
| S Jan 3, 2017 at 21:40 | history | suggested | tttbase |
Added Weil conjectures tag
|
|
| Jan 3, 2017 at 21:17 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 3, 2017 at 21:40 | |||||
| Nov 22, 2014 at 15:44 | comment | added | Blaisorblade | Somebody mentioned that "Grothendieck objected to Deligne's argument" - the topic is mentioned in passing by Pierre Cartier, and he says that Grothendieck felt "betrayed": xahlee.info/math/i/Alexander_Grothendieck_cartier.pdf | |
| Feb 28, 2010 at 8:30 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark |
added new tag (characteristic p)
|
|
| Feb 10, 2010 at 18:44 | answer | added | John McCarthy | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 10, 2010 at 4:02 | answer | added | Shizhuo Zhang | timeline score: 21 | |
| Feb 10, 2010 at 3:30 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 52 | |
| Feb 10, 2010 at 3:24 | answer | added | Harry Gindi | timeline score: 10 | |
| Feb 10, 2010 at 3:12 | history | asked | bhwang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |