Timeline for Riemann hypothesis generalization names: extended versus generalized?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2022 at 8:16 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
|
| Feb 25, 2010 at 14:12 | answer | added | Álvaro Lozano-Robledo | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 21:18 | history | edited | Ilya Grigoriev |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 9, 2010 at 21:14 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Kevin: An L-function is what you get by starting with a zeta function and adding a representation, no? | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 20:46 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | Until someone convinces me otherwise I am going to go with the assertion that "zeta function" and "L-function" mean the same thing, and the only reason that one is sometimes preferred over the other is historical coincidence. | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 20:31 | comment | added | M.G. | I would suggest this for community wiki. | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 19:06 | history | asked | Vipul Naik | CC BY-SA 2.5 |