Skip to main content
3 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 10, 2010 at 0:15 comment added John Stillwell @Sam: I take your point; there is no obvious equivalence between deciding whether a common cover exists, and deciding whether one graph covers another. I should have looked at Leighton's proof, which shows that graphs have a common cover if and only if they have the same "degree refinement", a matrix which is pretty clearly computable in polynomial time. This surprises me, because I did not expect testing for common covering to be easier than testing for covering.
Feb 9, 2010 at 15:11 comment added Sam Nead Detecting if given G covers fixed H sounds harder than deciding if given G, H have a common finite cover. Is there some non-obvious equivalence? I feel like I am missing something here...
Feb 9, 2010 at 10:43 history answered John Stillwell CC BY-SA 2.5