Timeline for How is this action of monoidal derived category induced?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2010 at 7:37 | history | rollback | Kim Morrison |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Feb 9, 2010 at 6:56 | vote | accept | Shizhuo Zhang | ||
| Feb 9, 2010 at 6:39 | comment | added | Greg Stevenson | Answered - I wasn't sure if that was the done thing. Thanks Mariano :) | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 6:37 | answer | added | Greg Stevenson | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 6:18 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Greg, you should write your comment as an answer so that it can be accepted. That's the usual etiquette! | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 6:07 | history | edited | Shizhuo Zhang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Feb 9, 2010 at 6:06 | comment | added | Shizhuo Zhang | @Greg: Yes,I think you are correct. | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:51 | comment | added | Shizhuo Zhang | @Harry: I'll check out it. Thank you | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:47 | history | edited | Shizhuo Zhang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 52 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:46 | comment | added | Greg Stevenson | Maybe I am missing something but since you have an additive functor you can lift it to the level of homotopy categories and then just left derive it... I'd call that an induced action | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:45 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Have you read Toen-Vezzosi (HAG I & II)? From what I've read of it, it's pretty good. You might like it. | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:42 | history | edited | Shizhuo Zhang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 102 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:40 | comment | added | Shizhuo Zhang | Actually, it is the paper by Lunts-Rosenberg(unpublished but in Max-Plank) | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:39 | comment | added | Shizhuo Zhang | How? Actually I did not use LaTeX here, I used a website codecogs.com/components/equationeditor/equationeditor.php I think it is good. If you can help me edit this page, I will appreciate very much! | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:39 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | It's almost definitely a paper by Kontsevich-Rosenberg. | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:37 | comment | added | Greg Stevenson | I'd be interested to know what the paper in question is. | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:37 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez |
Maybe you could remove all the \[ and \] in the LaTeX code, which does not help readability :)
|
|
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:29 | history | asked | Shizhuo Zhang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |