Timeline for From Calculus in $\mathbb{R}^n$ to Calculus in $\mathcal{H}$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 24, 2013 at 19:08 | vote | accept | alhal | ||
| Nov 11, 2013 at 17:14 | comment | added | alhal | @JohannesHahn Thanks, that was some very useful info! | |
| Nov 8, 2013 at 17:21 | answer | added | Valerie | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 7, 2013 at 17:01 | comment | added | Johannes Hahn | The problem with the $L\mathcal{H}$-concept ist, that there no single integration concept for banach space valued functions. There is at least the Bochner integral (which is the most literal translation of the Lebesgue integral into a banach space setting), the Riemann integral (which is in contrast to the fin.dim. case not a special case of the Bochner integral) and the Pettis integral (which is a generalization of both). | |
| Nov 7, 2013 at 16:47 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 7, 2013 at 14:06 | history | asked | alhal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |