Timeline for irreducible Classical Lie algebras [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 24, 2016 at 18:15 | vote | accept | user118746 | ||
Nov 10, 2013 at 13:59 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Nov 10, 2013 at 15:52 | |||||
S Nov 10, 2013 at 13:55 | history | suggested | Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
$F$o$r$m$a$t$t$i$n$g and STOP SHOUTING and splleing.
|
Nov 10, 2013 at 13:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 10, 2013 at 13:55 | |||||
Nov 10, 2013 at 13:43 | history | edited | user118746 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 236 characters in body
|
Nov 7, 2013 at 2:54 | history | closed |
Stefan Kohl♦ Qiaochu Yuan Andrey Rekalo Chris Godsil David White |
Needs details or clarity | |
Nov 7, 2013 at 2:00 | comment | added | user42090 | This is not a clear question. Please clarify what you mean exactly. | |
Nov 7, 2013 at 1:05 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 6, 2013 at 23:38 | comment | added | user118746 | i will improve my question as soon as possible. | |
Nov 6, 2013 at 23:32 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 7, 2013 at 2:54 | |||||
Nov 6, 2013 at 23:31 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | As David's comment suggests, your question is not yet well formulated. For instance, "irreducibility" of a Lie algebra here is not clearly defined. And of course there are problems about restricting from a large field to a very small one. | |
Nov 6, 2013 at 23:24 | history | edited | user118746 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 261 characters in body
|
Nov 6, 2013 at 22:57 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Please give us more information, for instance, how did this question arise, what do you already know. Otherwise this seems rather unmotivated past "I need to answer this question", which unfortunately makes it seem like homework. See also mathoverflow.net/help/how-to-ask | |
Nov 6, 2013 at 22:56 | history | asked | user118746 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |