Timeline for Existence of an "anti-additive" (or "never linear") map?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:31 | vote | accept | Samuel | ||
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:30 | history | edited | Samuel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 50 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:27 | vote | accept | Samuel | ||
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:31 | |||||
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:25 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | Please do not edit the question so much that existing answers to it stop being answers. If you want to ask another question, ask another question! | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:20 | history | edited | Samuel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 353 characters in body; added 30 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:12 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:09 | comment | added | Zev Chonoles | I agree with Mariano - for example, it seems likely that the sum of two such maps will not necessarily be another such map, and so the collection of such functions will not form a vector space as we would usually want. | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 19:05 | history | edited | Samuel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 78 characters in body; added 315 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:59 | history | edited | Samuel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:55 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | I would suggest not introducing a name for that class of functions... | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:55 | answer | added | Dmitri Panov | timeline score: 9 | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:42 | history | asked | Samuel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |