Timeline for Intuition for Primitive Cohomology
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2010 at 17:45 | answer | added | Evan Wright | timeline score: 18 | |
| Feb 9, 2010 at 7:11 | history | edited | vonjd |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 9, 2010 at 5:22 | vote | accept | Charles Siegel | ||
| Feb 9, 2010 at 2:00 | answer | added | Tim Perutz | timeline score: 39 | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:31 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | I believe that fixes it, unless I've butchered the definitions. | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:30 | history | edited | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:29 | comment | added | VA. | Typo: $L^{k+1}$ has degree $2k+2$, not $2k$. | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:05 | history | edited | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
notational clarification
|
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:04 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | Sorry, meant applied $k+1$ times. I'll edit. | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 18:03 | comment | added | Ilya Grigoriev | Stupid notational confusion: by $L^{k+1}$ do you mean L iterated k+1 times or L applied to $H^{k+1}$? | |
| Feb 8, 2010 at 17:56 | history | asked | Charles Siegel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |