Timeline for Rationality of curve does not depend on base change
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2017 at 12:15 | history | edited | Tomasz Lenarcik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fix grammar a little bit
|
| Nov 1, 2013 at 9:27 | vote | accept | Tomasz Lenarcik | ||
| Nov 1, 2013 at 9:26 | history | edited | Tomasz Lenarcik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added summary
|
| Nov 1, 2013 at 6:28 | answer | added | Pete L. Clark | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 3:05 | comment | added | Tomasz Lenarcik | Actually, I only need this lemma in case when $L$ is a pure transcendental extension of $k$. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 3:03 | comment | added | Tomasz Lenarcik | That's what I was afraid of :) Hopefully, in my particular use-case I can prove that $C$ has enough $k$-rational points. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 1:59 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | The argument fails at the last step: you need a $k$-rational point on $\overline{C}$ to carry this step out (if I understand you correctly) and such a point may not exist. | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 1:51 | answer | added | Abhinav Kumar | timeline score: 18 | |
| Nov 1, 2013 at 1:43 | history | asked | Tomasz Lenarcik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |