Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 16, 2020 at 12:53 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
edited tags, added name in title
Feb 16, 2020 at 12:52 comment added YCor I'd suggest to move Q2 to a separate thread, it's a fairly distinct question (and the groups $D(m,n)$ are far less studied, I'm even not sure that they explicitly appeared anywhere before this question except for a few small values of $m,n$.)
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
May 17, 2015 at 18:59 vote accept Salvo Tringali
Oct 31, 2013 at 19:52 history edited Salvo Tringali CC BY-SA 3.0
Update on Q1 and correction on Q2
Oct 31, 2013 at 14:29 comment added Salvo Tringali Yes, that's it. But now I wonder if I should have raised Q2 in a separate thread. In any case, thank you much for the fruitful exchange.
Oct 31, 2013 at 14:21 answer added YCor timeline score: 10
Oct 31, 2013 at 14:11 comment added YCor OK, you're right. Thus, to conclude, $BS(m,n)$ is bi-orderable iff $mn>0$ and $\min(|m|,|n|)=1$.
Oct 31, 2013 at 13:44 comment added Salvo Tringali If $XY \ne YX$, then $X^mY=YX^m$ is impossible for $m \ge 1$. For suppose wlog $XY \prec YX$. Then, $X^m Y \prec X^{m-1} Y X \prec \cdots \prec XYX^{m-1} \prec YX^m$, which is the same argument used in the OP to prove that ${\rm BS}(n,n)$ is not bi-orderable for $n \ge 2$ (it works as well for $|n| \ge 2$).
Oct 31, 2013 at 13:37 comment added YCor I agree with your first comment but don't understand the second one.
Oct 31, 2013 at 13:34 comment added Salvo Tringali As for your 2nd comment: $[X^m, Y] = 1$ iff $X^m Y = Y X^m$, and this is impossible if $m \ge 2$ for the same reason expressed in the OP with reference to the orderability of ${\rm BS}(n,n)$ when $n \ge 2$.
Oct 31, 2013 at 13:29 comment added Salvo Tringali Many thanks for the interest, Yves. Just a minor detail as for your 1st comment: I think it should be $Y = y^q$, so $X^s = Y^s = 1$ isn't true. Nevertheless, $X^s=Y^s$ is enough to conclude: Since $X\ne Y$ (here is where we use that $s =\gcd(m,n) \ge 2$), then either $X\prec Y$, and then $X^s\prec Y^s$, or $Y \prec X$, and then $Y^s\prec X^s$.
Oct 31, 2013 at 13:17 comment added YCor Also $BS(2,n)$ is not bi-orderable for any $n\ge 2$, because $A(2,n)$ is not bi-orderable. The reason is that in a biorderable group, $[X^2,Y]=1$ implies $[X,Y]=1$. Indeed $X(XYX^{-1}Y^{-1})X^{-1}=YXY^{-1}X^{-1}=(XYX^{-1}Y^{-1})^{-1}$, i.e. $c=XYX^{-1}Y^{-1}$ is conjugate to is inverse, and hence is trivial. This maybe generalizes to showing $[X^m,Y]=1\Rightarrow [X,Y]=1$ for any $m\ge 2$, in which case it would follow that $A(m,n)$ and hence $BS(m,n)$ is never bi-orderable if $m,n\ge 2$.
Oct 31, 2013 at 12:45 comment added YCor If $m,n\ge 2$ are not coprime then $BS(m,n)$ is not bi-orderable. Indeed it contains the amalgam $A(m,n)=\langle x,y\mid x^m=y^n\rangle$ as a subgroup. Then $A(m,n)$ is not bi-orderable. Indeed write $m=sp,n=sq$ with $s,p,q\ge 2$, $X=x^p$ and $Y=x^q$. Then $X\neq Y$ and $X^s=Y^s=1$. But extraction of $s$-roots is unique in a bi-orderable group. Indeed if $X<Y$, then $YX^{-1}>1$, hence $1<Y^{s-1}(YX^{-1})Y^{-s+1}=Y^sX^{-1}Y^{-s+1}=X^{s-1}Y^{-s+1}$, hence $X^{s-1}>Y^{s-1}$, but also since $X<Y$ we have $X^{s-1}<Y^{s-1}$, contradiction, and similarly contradiction if $Y>X$.
Oct 31, 2013 at 11:11 history edited Salvo Tringali CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed typos and ruled out some trivial cases
Oct 31, 2013 at 10:21 history asked Salvo Tringali CC BY-SA 3.0