Timeline for Automorphicity of L-Factors of Zeta Functions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2016 at 22:56 | answer | added | Myshkin | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 9, 2016 at 22:55 | history | edited | Myshkin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2013 at 15:44 | history | edited | Tom163 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
included definition of L-factors
|
| Oct 30, 2013 at 15:40 | comment | added | Tom163 | Yes, I am sorry, that is what I mean. In the article I mentioned, Langlands also uses the term "factor", and I couldn't think of a better term. In my confusing terminology, the L-factors are what I denote $L(H^m,s)$ in this question: mathoverflow.net/questions/144285/… | |
| Oct 30, 2013 at 14:45 | comment | added | David Loeffler | I was completely confused when I first read this by your usage of "L-factor". The usual usage of "L-factor" is to mean the factor of an Euler product at some specific place of $K$. But you're using it, if I understand correctly, to mean the factors in the expression for the zeta function as an alternating product of $L$-functions associated to the cohomology groups of the variety in each degree $0 \le i \le 2 \operatorname{dim} X$. | |
| Oct 30, 2013 at 14:23 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 30, 2013 at 12:49 | history | asked | Tom163 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |