Skip to main content

Timeline for When to start reviewing

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 8, 2020 at 15:50 history edited YCor
edited tags
Feb 11, 2011 at 11:44 comment added Emil Jeřábek @Zoran: What you are saying is certainly true for peer review, but I don't see how it applies to review databases of published articles like Zentralblatt or Math Reviews. The paper is already supposed to be vetted for correctness by the journal where it was accepted and published. It's not the job of a Zentralblatt reviewer to do that again, they are only supposed to provide an accurate and informative summary of the content of the paper.
Feb 10, 2011 at 14:14 comment added Zoran Skoda Well, Kevin this depends on the importance of the article and standing of the journal. If one gets a paper claiming a significant progress toward the Riemann conjecture one absolutely has a responsibility to spend more than two weeks reviewing it. The present carelessness of referees and of reviewers is so big a problem that being mainstream means being irresponsible. I think we should pressure on journals and reveiwing services to be more considerate in allowing additional time, when needed. I had pretty bad experience with services in few cases in which I was slightly late.
Feb 10, 2010 at 9:49 history edited Gil Kalai
edited tags
Feb 8, 2010 at 18:44 answer added JS Milne timeline score: 25
Feb 8, 2010 at 13:56 answer added Daniel Moskovich timeline score: 25
Feb 8, 2010 at 8:01 comment added Shizhuo Zhang I ever received such kind of request to review some papers in the field of computational mathematics and algorithm.. I just disregard all of them
Feb 8, 2010 at 7:56 answer added Pete L. Clark timeline score: 30
Feb 8, 2010 at 7:46 comment added Kevin Buzzard I wrote my first Math Review (MathSciNet) review when I was a grad student. Here's my advice: do it, but don't spend too much time on it. Remember that some reviews are of the form "copy out the first para of the article", and it would be good if you did better than that, but definitely don't spend 2 weeks worrying about a review before writing it, and then another 2 weeks writing it!
Feb 8, 2010 at 6:45 answer added Ryan Budney timeline score: 7
Feb 8, 2010 at 6:02 history asked B. Bischof CC BY-SA 2.5