Timeline for To which automorphic forms/rep's over a function field can we associate a Galois representation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2013 at 12:52 | vote | accept | anonymous | ||
| Oct 23, 2013 at 16:46 | answer | added | Olivier | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 23, 2013 at 16:43 | comment | added | Sylvain JULIEN | I'm definitely no expert, and I may be wrong, but you might expect L-functions associated to irreducible cuspidal automorphic representations to correspond exactly to primitive elements of the Selberg class. I don't know whether one can associate to any such primitive element a Galois representation though. | |
| Oct 23, 2013 at 15:24 | history | edited | anonymous |
added tag NT
|
|
| Oct 23, 2013 at 15:17 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 23, 2013 at 15:50 | |||||
| Oct 23, 2013 at 15:00 | history | asked | anonymous | CC BY-SA 3.0 |