Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

This seems to follow from the fact that the Chern classes are integral, an observation which is more mysterious using some definitions than others. For instance, I know of no direct way to prove that the Chern classes defined using Chern-Weil theory are integral; I would be very pleased if someone knows a way.

Using other definitions it is at least more standard; see the answers to this question, for instance: Cohomology ring of BGCohomology ring of BG.

This seems to follow from the fact that the Chern classes are integral, an observation which is more mysterious using some definitions than others. For instance, I know of no direct way to prove that the Chern classes defined using Chern-Weil theory are integral; I would be very pleased if someone knows a way.

Using other definitions it is at least more standard; see the answers to this question, for instance: Cohomology ring of BG.

This seems to follow from the fact that the Chern classes are integral, an observation which is more mysterious using some definitions than others. For instance, I know of no direct way to prove that the Chern classes defined using Chern-Weil theory are integral; I would be very pleased if someone knows a way.

Using other definitions it is at least more standard; see the answers to this question, for instance: Cohomology ring of BG.

Source Link
Paul Siegel
  • 29.2k
  • 19
  • 134
  • 200

This seems to follow from the fact that the Chern classes are integral, an observation which is more mysterious using some definitions than others. For instance, I know of no direct way to prove that the Chern classes defined using Chern-Weil theory are integral; I would be very pleased if someone knows a way.

Using other definitions it is at least more standard; see the answers to this question, for instance: Cohomology ring of BG.