Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

replace html by pdf since the html links seem too hard to fix
Source Link
darij grinberg
darij grinberg
  • 33.8k
  • 4
  • 118
  • 253

I don't think anyone mentioned Eisenstein's classic proof. This presentationThis presentation of it is pretty good. I find it clear and attractive, especially because it sort of avoids Gauss' Lemma (which is a clever gadget but somehow off-putting).

I don't think anyone mentioned Eisenstein's classic proof. This presentation of it is pretty good. I find it clear and attractive, especially because it sort of avoids Gauss' Lemma (which is a clever gadget but somehow off-putting).

I don't think anyone mentioned Eisenstein's classic proof. This presentation of it is pretty good. I find it clear and attractive, especially because it sort of avoids Gauss' Lemma (which is a clever gadget but somehow off-putting).

(Typo correction)
Source Link
Alon Amit
Alon Amit
  • 6.7k
  • 3
  • 53
  • 83

I don't think anyone mentioned Eisenstein's classic proof. This presentation of it is pretty good. I find it clear and attractive, especially because it sort of avoidavoids Gauss' Lemma (which is a clever gadget but somehow off-putting).

I don't think anyone mentioned Eisenstein's classic proof. This presentation of it is pretty good. I find it clear and attractive, especially because it sort of avoid Gauss' Lemma (which is a clever gadget but somehow off-putting).

I don't think anyone mentioned Eisenstein's classic proof. This presentation of it is pretty good. I find it clear and attractive, especially because it sort of avoids Gauss' Lemma (which is a clever gadget but somehow off-putting).

Source Link
Alon Amit
Alon Amit
  • 6.7k
  • 3
  • 53
  • 83

I don't think anyone mentioned Eisenstein's classic proof. This presentation of it is pretty good. I find it clear and attractive, especially because it sort of avoid Gauss' Lemma (which is a clever gadget but somehow off-putting).