Timeline for Dynamic of $SL_2(\mathbb{Z}$) on $\mathbb{C}^2$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 30, 2013 at 15:24 | comment | added | Barbara Schapira | Sorry, I wrote my comment too fast; it contains many imprecisions. In fact, my first reaction was due to te fact that I was confused by notations $H^2$ and $\mathbb{H}^2$ that I identified in a first reading. | |
Oct 30, 2013 at 14:51 | comment | added | R W | Did you have a chance to notice that the OP asked about the action of $SL(2,\mathbb Z)$? Or do you want to say that in this situation there is no difference between $\mathbb C$ and $\mathbb Z$? If so, then you are definitely wrong. | |
Oct 30, 2013 at 14:32 | comment | added | Barbara Schapira | It seems to me that your answer contains some confusions. The good reference is Ledrappier-Pollicott below. The linear action of SL(2,C) on $C^2$ is (up to some details) the isometric action of SL(2,C) on the space of horospheres of $H^3$. This action is not dissipative, and admits dense orbits for example.(You can replace $\C$ by $\R$ and $\H^3$ by $\H^2$ above) | |
Oct 22, 2013 at 21:14 | comment | added | R W | No-no-no - what I mean is the really trivial action - the one which does nothing. | |
Oct 22, 2013 at 7:22 | comment | added | Selim G | The trivial action of $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ on $\mathbb{R}$ is the action by linear fractional transformations ? | |
Oct 21, 2013 at 17:09 | vote | accept | Selim G | ||
Oct 21, 2013 at 16:13 | vote | accept | Selim G | ||
Oct 21, 2013 at 16:16 | |||||
Oct 21, 2013 at 15:09 | history | edited | R W | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
Oct 21, 2013 at 14:55 | history | answered | R W | CC BY-SA 3.0 |