Timeline for what's the best way to characterise the distribution of prime elements in simple perfect squared squares
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | @StuartAnderson: Corrected the plot again. | |
Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected by Stuart again.
|
Oct 21, 2013 at 12:42 | comment | added | Stuart Anderson | @JosephO'Rourke you are right, the 18th value is 2, which I missed. I have edited the question to include it. | |
Oct 21, 2013 at 11:08 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | @StuartAnderson: 0,18 is 19 numbers, but you only list 18. So I plotted your 18 numbers from 0 to 17. | |
Oct 21, 2013 at 11:07 | history | edited | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body; added 35 characters in body
|
Oct 21, 2013 at 10:47 | comment | added | Stuart Anderson | as noted above the value 29652 should be 20652 and the frequencies start at 0 not 1. | |
Oct 21, 2013 at 10:41 | comment | added | Stefan Kohl♦ | I guess rather than being an answer this would be a case for a graphical comment! | |
Oct 20, 2013 at 16:27 | history | answered | Joseph O'Rourke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |