Timeline for Can transcedence degree be defined for arbitrary ring homomorphism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2013 at 1:46 | answer | added | darij grinberg | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 22:40 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 11, 2013 at 19:50 | history | suggested | Sasha Anan'in | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected TeX and wording, inserted a more exact reference
|
| Oct 11, 2013 at 19:48 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 11, 2013 at 19:50 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2013 at 15:08 | answer | added | Sasha Anan'in | timeline score: 11 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 12:13 | history | edited | user39380 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 116 characters in body
|
| Oct 11, 2013 at 11:32 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | You should be more confident in yourself! | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 11:29 | comment | added | user39380 | But I am not sure because I did not see such a definition anywhere which does not require either to be field or domain. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 11:23 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | I'd say it makes sense. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 11:15 | history | asked | user39380 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |