Timeline for Is there an easy proof of this equation related to simultaneous Pell equations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2013 at 14:17 | comment | added | Kieren MacMillan | @GerryMyerson: I'm certainly not trying to hide anything. I just didn't think that deleted observation was worth MO bandwidth, once I saw how trivial it was. | |
| Sep 29, 2013 at 12:18 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Deleted posts are visible to those with enough points. I don't know that documentation is required, but speaking for myself, I like people posting here to put all their cards on the table. | |
| Sep 29, 2013 at 11:39 | history | edited | Kieren MacMillan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added description of factorization approach
|
| Sep 29, 2013 at 11:22 | comment | added | Kieren MacMillan | @GerryMyerson: I found soon after I posted that the result was trivial, so I didn't think it worthy of remaining on MO. I did not know (1) that deleted posts are still visible, nor (2) that such documentation was required or expected. As you can tell from my reputation points and/or profile, I'm fairly new to MO and MSE — are these rules and expectations listed somewhere? Sorry, Kieren. | |
| Sep 29, 2013 at 5:36 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Noting for documentation sake that OP posted, and then deleted, another question about these equation recently, mathoverflow.net/questions/143301/… | |
| Sep 29, 2013 at 5:36 | answer | added | Noam D. Elkies | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 29, 2013 at 1:26 | history | asked | Kieren MacMillan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |