Timeline for An extension of Morera's Theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2014 at 2:49 | vote | accept | booksee | ||
| Sep 28, 2013 at 5:18 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | "If $\oint_\gamma f=0$ for any closed curve $\gamma$" is ambiguous. A reasonable reader could think it means "If there is any closed curve $\gamma$ for which $\oint_\gamma f=0$". But I don't think that's what was intended in this case. Simply changing "any" to "every" would disambiguate it. | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 13:29 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Sep 27, 2013 at 13:21 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 11 | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 12:58 | answer | added | Sean Eberhard | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 9:59 | comment | added | GH from MO | @Sean: Very nice proof on that webpage. I suggest that you add your comment as an answer, because it really answers the original question. | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 9:06 | comment | added | Sean Eberhard | Some googling reveals anhngq.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/… | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 6:12 | comment | added | Dan Petersen | Number 2 doesn't seem more ambitious to me in light of Morera's theorem. | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 4:26 | history | asked | booksee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |