Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 18, 2020 at 12:28 comment added pi_1 @ulrich In the proof of the proposition 3.9.1, it seems that for Kollar, a group action is, in particular a smooth morphism $G\times X\rightarrow X$, or am I mistaken ? (or maybe for him smooth morphism only means that any fiber is smooth??)
Oct 25, 2019 at 19:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 27, 2019 at 19:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 28, 2019 at 18:15 history edited user64494 CC BY-SA 4.0
A typo in the title is corrected.
May 28, 2019 at 16:37 answer added Diego Sulca timeline score: 6
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Sep 26, 2013 at 18:00 comment added Jim Bryan I've need to reference this in a paper and used: Cor 7.6.3, O. E. Villamayor U. Patching local uniformizations. Ann. Sci. E ́cole Norm. Sup. (4), 25(6):629–677, 1992.
Sep 26, 2013 at 12:10 comment added Libli @ulrich Thanks! I still wonder why many papers only deal with finite group actions. But that does not really matter, now I have this reference.
Sep 26, 2013 at 10:58 comment added naf Equivariant resolutions exist for the action of any algebraic group. See, for example, 3.9.1 in Kollar's book "Lectures on resolution of singularities".
Sep 26, 2013 at 10:37 history asked Libli CC BY-SA 3.0