Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
johndoe
  • 523
  • 3
  • 7

I think your last sentence/question is not well posed. It is well known that there are flat manifolds admitting plenty of non-flat vector bundles. E.g. see J. Smillie, "Flat manifolds with non-zero eulerEuler characteristics".

Sorry about the commentlike answer but I do not have enough points to properly comment.

I think your last sentence/question is not well posed. It is well known that there are flat manifolds admitting plenty of non-flat vector bundles. E.g. see J. Smillie, "Flat manifolds with non-zero euler characteristics".

Sorry about the commentlike answer but I do not have enough points to properly comment.

I think your last sentence/question is not well posed. It is well known that there are flat manifolds admitting plenty of non-flat vector bundles. E.g. see J. Smillie, "Flat manifolds with non-zero Euler characteristics".

Sorry about the commentlike answer but I do not have enough points to properly comment.

Source Link
johndoe
  • 523
  • 3
  • 7

I think your last sentence/question is not well posed. It is well known that there are flat manifolds admitting plenty of non-flat vector bundles. E.g. see J. Smillie, "Flat manifolds with non-zero euler characteristics".

Sorry about the commentlike answer but I do not have enough points to properly comment.