Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 1, 2020 at 16:18 answer added ADL timeline score: 3
Mar 4, 2014 at 10:08 history edited bemihai CC BY-SA 3.0
added 63 characters in body
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:54 vote accept bemihai
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:53 vote accept bemihai
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:54
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:53 vote accept bemihai
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:53
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:48 answer added HJRW timeline score: 10
Sep 23, 2013 at 19:34 answer added YCor timeline score: 7
Sep 23, 2013 at 18:39 history edited bemihai CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3 characters in body
Sep 23, 2013 at 18:39 comment added bemihai Thanks for the answer. The conclusion of the Karrass-Solitar result is for the centralizer of $g$ in $G$.
Sep 23, 2013 at 18:23 comment added YCor At least you'll need to replace in the conclusion "the centralizer of $g\in G$ is virtually cyclic" instead of "cyclic": indeed if $H$ has a finite subgroup $F$ that is normal in both $A$ and $B$ then many elements not conjugate to $A\cup B$ will centralize $F$. (Also: in the question: do you mean that $g$ is in a conjugate of a factor, or its centralizer?)
Sep 23, 2013 at 17:59 history edited bemihai CC BY-SA 3.0
added 204 characters in body
Sep 23, 2013 at 17:45 comment added YCor could you recall the meaning of almost malnormal and weakly malnormal? ($H\le G$ is malnormal if $gHg^{-1}\cap H=\{1\}$ for every $g\in G\smallsetminus H$)
Sep 23, 2013 at 13:47 review First posts
Sep 23, 2013 at 13:54
Sep 23, 2013 at 13:31 history asked bemihai CC BY-SA 3.0