Skip to main content
deleted 295 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
user36136
user36136

Do inner models of unique measurable cardinals have a regular behavior? (Edited and Revised Version)

Definition (1): A ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎is a‎ ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎with a‎ ‎unique ‎normal ‎measure.‎ ‎

Remark (1): Unique measurable cardinals have a very special property. Note We know that if ‎$‎‎\kappa‎‎$ is a‎ ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎and ‎‎$‎‎\mu$ be a‎ ‎two-valued ‎non-trivial ‎‎trivial‎‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$-additive ‎measure ‎on ‎it ‎the‎n the corresponding inner model produced by Mostowski collapse of Scott's ultraproduct (‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu}$‎) is dependent on both ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎and ‎‎$‎‎\mu$. ‎By‎So by ‎changing ‎measures ‎‎on a certain measurable cardinal we ‎can ‎produce ‎many different ‎inner ‎models. ‎But ‎on a ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$‎, ‎changing ‎measures don't give us a ‎new ‎inner ‎modelsEven by transitivity if two such inner models be isomorphic then they are equal. ‎Because ‎if ‎$\mu‎‎_{1}$ ‎and ‎$\mu_{2}‎‎$ ‎‎‎be ‎two ‎Rudin-Kiesler ‎equivalent ‎measures ‎onNow a question is:

"Is it possible to have a measurable cardinal ‎‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎then ‎we ‎have ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu_{1}}\cong M_{‎\kappa‎, \mu_{2}‎‎}$ ‎and ‎by ‎transitivity ‎of ‎these ‎models it is clear that ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu_{1}}= M_{‎\kappa‎, \mu_{2}‎‎}‎‎$. ‎So ‎if ‎‎$‎‎\kappa‎‎$ ‎bewhich its inner models be independent from its measures?"

Precisely:

Definition (1): A ‎"unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal" ‎is a‎ ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎with a ‎unique ‎normal ‎measurewhich for all two-valued ‎non-trivial ‎‎$‎‎\mu_{0}$‎, then any other measure on ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎is ‎Rudin-Kiesler ‎equivalent ‎with ‎‎$‎‎\mu_{0}$ ‎and ‎so ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa , ‎\mu_{0}‎‎}$ ‎will ‎be ‎the ‎unique ‎inner ‎model which one can produce by Scott's constructionadditive ‎measures like $\mu$ and $\mu'$ ‎on ‎it we have $M_{\kappa , \mu}=M_{\kappa , \mu'}$. ‎WeWe show ‎it ‎by ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎}$this unique inner model by $M_{\kappa}$.

Question (1): Is the following statement true?

$Con(ZFC+ \text{there exists a measurable cardinal})\Longrightarrow$ $Con(ZFC+ \text{there exists a unique measurable cardianl})$

‎Now ‎the ‎main ‎question ‎is ‎about ‎the ‎behavio‎r of the "well defined" function ‎$‎\kappa ‎‎\mapsto ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}‎‎‎‎$:‎ ‎

Definition (2): Define:‎ ‎

The collection of all unique measurable cardinals: ‎ ‎

$‎‎‎UM:=‎\lbrace ‎‎‎\kappa‎~|~‎\kappa~‎\text{is a unique measurable cardinal‎}‎\rbrace‎$ ‎‎ ‎

The ‎(informal) ‎collection ‎of ‎all ‎inner ‎models ‎of ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinals: ‎ ‎

‎‎$‎‎IUM:=‎\lbrace ‎‎‎M_{\kappa}‎~|~‎\kappa ‎\in UM ‎\rbrace‎‎‎$‎ ‎

Question (12): ‎Is ‎the ‎function‎ ‎$‎\kappa ‎‎\mapsto ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}‎$ ‎from ‎‎$‎‎UM$ ‎to ‎‎$‎‎IUM$ (strictly) ‎‎increasing? ‎In ‎the ‎other ‎words which one of the following statements are true?‎ ‎

‎‎$‎‎(1)~‎\forall ‎‎\kappa‎,‎\lambda ‎\in UM~~~~~(‎\kappa < ‎‎‎\lambda ‎‎\longrightarrow ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}\subseteq M_{‎\lambda‎}‎‎‎‎‎)‎‎$‎ ‎

$‎‎(2)~‎\forall ‎‎\kappa‎,‎\lambda ‎\in UM~~~~~(‎\kappa < ‎‎‎\lambda ‎‎\longrightarrow ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}\subsetneq M_{‎\lambda‎}‎‎‎‎‎)‎‎$‎ ‎‎

Do inner models of unique measurable cardinals have a regular behavior?

Definition (1): A ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎is a‎ ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎with a‎ ‎unique ‎normal ‎measure.‎ ‎

Remark (1): Unique measurable cardinals have a very special property. Note that if ‎$‎‎\kappa‎‎$ is a‎ ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎and ‎‎$‎‎\mu$ be a‎ ‎two-valued ‎non-trivial ‎‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$-additive ‎measure ‎on ‎it ‎the‎n the corresponding inner model produced by Mostowski collapse of Scott's ultraproduct (‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu}$‎) is dependent on both ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎and ‎‎$‎‎\mu$. ‎By ‎changing ‎measures ‎‎on a certain measurable cardinal we ‎can ‎produce ‎many different ‎inner ‎models. ‎But ‎on a ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$‎, ‎changing ‎measures don't give us a ‎new ‎inner ‎models. ‎Because ‎if ‎$\mu‎‎_{1}$ ‎and ‎$\mu_{2}‎‎$ ‎‎‎be ‎two ‎Rudin-Kiesler ‎equivalent ‎measures ‎on a measurable cardinal ‎‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎then ‎we ‎have ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu_{1}}\cong M_{‎\kappa‎, \mu_{2}‎‎}$ ‎and ‎by ‎transitivity ‎of ‎these ‎models it is clear that ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu_{1}}= M_{‎\kappa‎, \mu_{2}‎‎}‎‎$. ‎So ‎if ‎‎$‎‎\kappa‎‎$ ‎be a‎ ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎with a ‎unique ‎normal ‎measure ‎‎$‎‎\mu_{0}$‎, then any other measure on ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎is ‎Rudin-Kiesler ‎equivalent ‎with ‎‎$‎‎\mu_{0}$ ‎and ‎so ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa , ‎\mu_{0}‎‎}$ ‎will ‎be ‎the ‎unique ‎inner ‎model which one can produce by Scott's construction. ‎We show ‎it ‎by ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎}$.

‎Now ‎the ‎main ‎question ‎is ‎about ‎the ‎behavio‎r of the "well defined" function ‎$‎\kappa ‎‎\mapsto ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}‎‎‎‎$:‎ ‎

Definition (2): Define:‎ ‎

The collection of all unique measurable cardinals: ‎ ‎

$‎‎‎UM:=‎\lbrace ‎‎‎\kappa‎~|~‎\kappa~‎\text{is a unique measurable cardinal‎}‎\rbrace‎$ ‎‎ ‎

The ‎(informal) ‎collection ‎of ‎all ‎inner ‎models ‎of ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinals: ‎ ‎

‎‎$‎‎IUM:=‎\lbrace ‎‎‎M_{\kappa}‎~|~‎\kappa ‎\in UM ‎\rbrace‎‎‎$‎ ‎

Question (1): ‎Is ‎the ‎function‎ ‎$‎\kappa ‎‎\mapsto ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}‎$ ‎from ‎‎$‎‎UM$ ‎to ‎‎$‎‎IUM$ (strictly) ‎‎increasing? ‎In ‎the ‎other ‎words which one of the following statements are true?‎ ‎

‎‎$‎‎(1)~‎\forall ‎‎\kappa‎,‎\lambda ‎\in UM~~~~~(‎\kappa < ‎‎‎\lambda ‎‎\longrightarrow ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}\subseteq M_{‎\lambda‎}‎‎‎‎‎)‎‎$‎ ‎

$‎‎(2)~‎\forall ‎‎\kappa‎,‎\lambda ‎\in UM~~~~~(‎\kappa < ‎‎‎\lambda ‎‎\longrightarrow ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}\subsetneq M_{‎\lambda‎}‎‎‎‎‎)‎‎$‎ ‎‎

Do inner models of unique measurable cardinals have a regular behavior? (Edited and Revised Version)

We know that if ‎$‎‎\kappa‎‎$ is a‎ ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎and ‎‎$‎‎\mu$ be a‎ ‎two-valued ‎non-trivial‎‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$-additive ‎measure ‎on ‎it ‎the‎n the corresponding inner model produced by Mostowski collapse of Scott's ultraproduct (‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu}$‎) is dependent on both ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎and ‎‎$‎‎\mu$. ‎So by ‎changing ‎measures ‎‎on a certain measurable cardinal we ‎can ‎produce ‎many different ‎inner ‎models. Even by transitivity if two such inner models be isomorphic then they are equal. Now a question is:

"Is it possible to have a measurable cardinal which its inner models be independent from its measures?"

Precisely:

Definition (1): A ‎"unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal" ‎is a‎ ‎measurable ‎cardinal which for all two-valued ‎non-trivial ‎‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$-additive ‎measures like $\mu$ and $\mu'$ ‎on ‎it we have $M_{\kappa , \mu}=M_{\kappa , \mu'}$. We show this unique inner model by $M_{\kappa}$.

Question (1): Is the following statement true?

$Con(ZFC+ \text{there exists a measurable cardinal})\Longrightarrow$ $Con(ZFC+ \text{there exists a unique measurable cardianl})$

‎Now ‎the ‎main ‎question ‎is ‎about ‎the ‎behavio‎r of the "well defined" function ‎$‎\kappa ‎‎\mapsto ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}‎‎‎‎$:‎ ‎

Definition (2): Define:‎ ‎

The collection of all unique measurable cardinals: ‎ ‎

$‎‎‎UM:=‎\lbrace ‎‎‎\kappa‎~|~‎\kappa~‎\text{is a unique measurable cardinal‎}‎\rbrace‎$ ‎‎ ‎

The ‎(informal) ‎collection ‎of ‎all ‎inner ‎models ‎of ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinals: ‎ ‎

‎‎$‎‎IUM:=‎\lbrace ‎‎‎M_{\kappa}‎~|~‎\kappa ‎\in UM ‎\rbrace‎‎‎$‎ ‎

Question (2): ‎Is ‎the ‎function‎ ‎$‎\kappa ‎‎\mapsto ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}‎$ ‎from ‎‎$‎‎UM$ ‎to ‎‎$‎‎IUM$ (strictly) ‎‎increasing? ‎In ‎the ‎other ‎words which one of the following statements are true?‎ ‎

‎‎$‎‎(1)~‎\forall ‎‎\kappa‎,‎\lambda ‎\in UM~~~~~(‎\kappa < ‎‎‎\lambda ‎‎\longrightarrow ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}\subseteq M_{‎\lambda‎}‎‎‎‎‎)‎‎$‎ ‎

$‎‎(2)~‎\forall ‎‎\kappa‎,‎\lambda ‎\in UM~~~~~(‎\kappa < ‎‎‎\lambda ‎‎\longrightarrow ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}\subsetneq M_{‎\lambda‎}‎‎‎‎‎)‎‎$‎ ‎‎

Source Link
user36136
user36136

Do inner models of unique measurable cardinals have a regular behavior?

Definition (1): A ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎is a‎ ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎with a‎ ‎unique ‎normal ‎measure.‎ ‎

Remark (1): Unique measurable cardinals have a very special property. Note that if ‎$‎‎\kappa‎‎$ is a‎ ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎and ‎‎$‎‎\mu$ be a‎ ‎two-valued ‎non-trivial ‎‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$-additive ‎measure ‎on ‎it ‎the‎n the corresponding inner model produced by Mostowski collapse of Scott's ultraproduct (‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu}$‎) is dependent on both ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎and ‎‎$‎‎\mu$. ‎By ‎changing ‎measures ‎‎on a certain measurable cardinal we ‎can ‎produce ‎many different ‎inner ‎models. ‎But ‎on a ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$‎, ‎changing ‎measures don't give us a ‎new ‎inner ‎models. ‎Because ‎if ‎$\mu‎‎_{1}$ ‎and ‎$\mu_{2}‎‎$ ‎‎‎be ‎two ‎Rudin-Kiesler ‎equivalent ‎measures ‎on a measurable cardinal ‎‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎then ‎we ‎have ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu_{1}}\cong M_{‎\kappa‎, \mu_{2}‎‎}$ ‎and ‎by ‎transitivity ‎of ‎these ‎models it is clear that ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎,\mu_{1}}= M_{‎\kappa‎, \mu_{2}‎‎}‎‎$. ‎So ‎if ‎‎$‎‎\kappa‎‎$ ‎be a‎ ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinal ‎with a ‎unique ‎normal ‎measure ‎‎$‎‎\mu_{0}$‎, then any other measure on ‎$‎‎‎\kappa‎$ ‎is ‎Rudin-Kiesler ‎equivalent ‎with ‎‎$‎‎\mu_{0}$ ‎and ‎so ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa , ‎\mu_{0}‎‎}$ ‎will ‎be ‎the ‎unique ‎inner ‎model which one can produce by Scott's construction. ‎We show ‎it ‎by ‎‎$‎‎M_{‎\kappa‎}$.‎ ‎

‎Now ‎the ‎main ‎question ‎is ‎about ‎the ‎behavio‎r of the "well defined" function ‎$‎\kappa ‎‎\mapsto ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}‎‎‎‎$:‎ ‎

Definition (2): Define:‎ ‎

The collection of all unique measurable cardinals: ‎ ‎

$‎‎‎UM:=‎\lbrace ‎‎‎\kappa‎~|~‎\kappa~‎\text{is a unique measurable cardinal‎}‎\rbrace‎$ ‎‎ ‎

The ‎(informal) ‎collection ‎of ‎all ‎inner ‎models ‎of ‎unique ‎measurable ‎cardinals: ‎ ‎

‎‎$‎‎IUM:=‎\lbrace ‎‎‎M_{\kappa}‎~|~‎\kappa ‎\in UM ‎\rbrace‎‎‎$‎ ‎

Question (1): ‎Is ‎the ‎function‎ ‎$‎\kappa ‎‎\mapsto ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}‎$ ‎from ‎‎$‎‎UM$ ‎to ‎‎$‎‎IUM$ (strictly) ‎‎increasing? ‎In ‎the ‎other ‎words which one of the following statements are true?‎ ‎

‎‎$‎‎(1)~‎\forall ‎‎\kappa‎,‎\lambda ‎\in UM~~~~~(‎\kappa < ‎‎‎\lambda ‎‎\longrightarrow ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}\subseteq M_{‎\lambda‎}‎‎‎‎‎)‎‎$‎ ‎

$‎‎(2)~‎\forall ‎‎\kappa‎,‎\lambda ‎\in UM~~~~~(‎\kappa < ‎‎‎\lambda ‎‎\longrightarrow ‎M_{‎\kappa‎}\subsetneq M_{‎\lambda‎}‎‎‎‎‎)‎‎$‎ ‎‎