Timeline for Reference for cohomology vanishing
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2010 at 0:31 | vote | accept | Jorge Vitório Pereira | ||
| Feb 6, 2010 at 0:31 | vote | accept | Jorge Vitório Pereira | ||
| Feb 6, 2010 at 0:31 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2010 at 17:33 | answer | added | Hailong Dao | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 5, 2010 at 14:16 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | Ah, of course! Can't believe I was that stupid. I'll give the question more thought, then. | |
| Feb 5, 2010 at 14:15 | comment | added | algori | Charles -- GAGA fails miserably for non-complete varieties. | |
| Feb 5, 2010 at 14:14 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 5, 2010 at 14:01 | comment | added | Charles Siegel | I may be missing something, but doesn't it just follow from GAGA considerations? Take $U$ to be the complement of an algebraic set, note that every algebraic set is analytic, and then use GAGA to switch between the analytic sheaf and the algebraic sheaf. | |
| Feb 5, 2010 at 13:53 | history | asked | Jorge Vitório Pereira | CC BY-SA 2.5 |