Timeline for Defining $\{a_i\}$ as $(1+x+⋯+x^k)^n =\sum_{i=0}^{kn}a_ix^i$, then is the 'special' difference-sequence $\{d^Na_i\}$ a unimodal sequence?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Sep 21, 2013 at 14:32 | vote | accept | mathlove | ||
Sep 20, 2013 at 1:44 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 8 | |
Sep 19, 2013 at 23:20 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo in title
|
Sep 19, 2013 at 15:50 | history | edited | mathlove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Sep 19, 2013 at 15:11 | history | edited | mathlove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
Sep 19, 2013 at 9:45 | history | edited | mathlove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Sep 19, 2013 at 9:35 | comment | added | mathlove | @MarcvanLeeuwen: You are right. Thank you so much. | |
Sep 19, 2013 at 9:35 | history | edited | mathlove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 136 characters in body; edited title
|
Sep 19, 2013 at 9:17 | comment | added | Marc van Leeuwen | Please change the title! What the title asks is standard stuff, what the body asks not, as far as I know. Also please use a different symbol than $\Delta$ for the truncated finite difference operator, in particular since you use that symbol before givin a non-standard definition of it; this is bound to confuse readers. | |
Sep 19, 2013 at 8:14 | answer | added | Brendan McKay | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 19, 2013 at 7:13 | history | asked | mathlove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |