Timeline for $A \otimes^L_B C$ computing the derived fiber product of schemes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 30, 2013 at 19:10 | history | bounty ended | Puraṭci Vinnani | ||
| S Sep 30, 2013 at 19:10 | history | notice removed | Puraṭci Vinnani | ||
| Sep 30, 2013 at 19:10 | vote | accept | Puraṭci Vinnani | ||
| S Sep 23, 2013 at 4:40 | history | bounty started | Puraṭci Vinnani | ||
| S Sep 23, 2013 at 4:40 | history | notice added | Puraṭci Vinnani | Improve details | |
| Sep 23, 2013 at 4:39 | history | edited | Puraṭci Vinnani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2013 at 16:39 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | The tensor product of commutative rings corresponds to the fiber product of the associated affine schemes, but I think one should be careful with terminology and notation. | |
| Sep 19, 2013 at 16:34 | history | edited | Puraṭci Vinnani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body; edited title
|
| Sep 19, 2013 at 3:17 | answer | added | Sasha | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 19, 2013 at 3:05 | comment | added | Sasha | "tensor" = "fiber". | |
| Sep 19, 2013 at 2:46 | comment | added | Dylan Wilson | Is there even an ordinary "tensor product" of schemes? | |
| Sep 19, 2013 at 2:36 | history | edited | Puraṭci Vinnani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2013 at 2:31 | history | asked | Puraṭci Vinnani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |