Timeline for Why do Littlewood-Richardson coefficients describe the cohomology of the Grassmannian?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2021 at 5:14 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @AllenKnutson thanks! I have edited in better links | |
| Sep 22, 2021 at 5:14 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed arxiv front-end link
|
| Sep 22, 2021 at 0:45 | vote | accept | Steven Sam | ||
| Sep 21, 2021 at 11:44 | history | edited | Allen Knutson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Sep 21, 2021 at 11:23 | comment | added | Allen Knutson | Prakash Belkale, Invariant theory of 𝐺 𝐿 (𝑛) and intersection theory of Grassman- nians. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2004), no. 69, 3709–3721. | |
| Sep 20, 2021 at 5:29 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Allen, is that link in point 3. supposed to go to this paper: arxiv.org/abs/math/0208107v2 ? We need to replace that link, but I can't quite identify the proof you mention in that paper, as I don't know the area. | |
| S May 13, 2017 at 16:24 | history | suggested | Christian Gaetz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified reference; fixed spelling.
|
| May 13, 2017 at 16:17 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 13, 2017 at 16:24 | |||||
| Sep 14, 2014 at 18:10 | vote | accept | Steven Sam | ||
| Jul 13, 2016 at 16:47 | |||||
| Dec 12, 2013 at 20:54 | comment | added | Steven Sam | It is worth pointing out that after many discussions with Allen, we came to the conclusion that point 2 above is flawed and does not lead to a satisfactory explanation. | |
| Feb 5, 2010 at 21:06 | history | edited | Allen Knutson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
two things LEFT to do
|
| Feb 5, 2010 at 6:42 | vote | accept | Steven Sam | ||
| Sep 14, 2014 at 18:10 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2010 at 4:32 | history | answered | Allen Knutson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |