Skip to main content

If X$X$ is a class of finite groups and G$G$ is a finite group, then P$P$ is an X$X$-covering subgroup of G$G$ if P$P$ is in X$X$, and whenever P ≤ H ≤ G, N ⊴ H$P \le H \le G, N \unlhd H$, and H/N$H/N$ in X$X$, then PN=H$PN=H$. In other words, P$P$ covers every X$X$-factor of G$G$. If X$X$ is the class of finite p$p$-groups, then X$X$-covering subgroups of G$G$ and Sylow p$p$-subgroups of G$G$ are the same thing. Indeed, if P$P$ is an X$X$-covering group, and if H$H$ is a Sylow p$p$-subgroup containing P$P$ and N=1$N=1$, then we must have H=P$H=P$. If P$P$ is a Sylow p$p$-subgroup and H$H$ contains P$P$ with N ⊴ H$N \unlhd H$ and [H:N]$[H:N]$ a power of p$p$, then [H:NP]$[H:NP]$ is a divisor of [H:N]$[H:N]$ and [H:P]$[H:P]$, so must be 1$1$. Notice how the "containment" part of the Sylow theorems is replaced with a "covering" condition that behaves better with the normal structure of the group.

If G$G$ is a finite solvable group and X$X$ is the class of nilpotent groups, then there is a sort of "Sylow nilpotent subgroup", the X$X$-covering groups or Carter subgroups. They were studied by R.W. Carter who described them as self-normalizing nilpotent subgroups. Like Sylow p$p$-subgroups, there is exactly one conjugacy class of Carter subgroups, and they have some reasonable arithmetic properties. People tried to determine which classes X$X$ of groups are such that X$X$-covering groups exist and are unique up to conjugacy. Roughly speaking, this was the dawn of the modern theory of finite soluble groups, with Gaschütz's (et al.) classification of such X$X$ as "saturated formations".

This shifts focus away from the subgroup P$P$ to the class X$X$. If X$X$ is sufficiently nice, then there will be a nicely embedded X-subgroup for any finite group.

Sylow p$p$-subgroups also satisfy a dual condition, they are also X$X$-injectors for the class X$X$ of finite p$p$-groups. If X$X$ is a class of finite groups, and G$G$ is a finite group, then P$P$ is an X$X$-injector of G$G$ if for every subnormal subgroup N$N$ of G, P∩N$G, P\cap N$ is a maximal X$X$-subgroup of N$N$. The dual definition of covering group (for X$X$ a saturated formation) is that P$P$ is an X$X$-covering group iff PN/N$PN/N$ is a maximal X$X$-subgroup of G/N$G/N$ for every N ⊴ G$N \unlhd G$. If X$X$ is the class of finite nilpotent groups, then X$X$-injectors are called Fischer subgroups and again form a single, well-behaved conjugacy class of subgroups. A Fischer subgroup of a finite soluble group is a nilpotent subgroup that contains every nilpotent subgroup that it normalizes. This is similar to the idea that a Sylow p$p$-subgroup contains every p$p$-group that it normalizes. X $X$ such that X$X$-injectors form a unique conjugacy class are called Fitting classes, due to their similarity to Fitting's lemma on subnormal nilpotent subgroups.

If X is a class of finite groups and G is a finite group, then P is an X-covering subgroup of G if P is in X, and whenever P ≤ H ≤ G, N ⊴ H, and H/N in X, then PN=H. In other words, P covers every X-factor of G. If X is the class of finite p-groups, then X-covering subgroups of G and Sylow p-subgroups of G are the same thing. Indeed, if P is an X-covering group, and if H is a Sylow p-subgroup containing P and N=1, then we must have H=P. If P is a Sylow p-subgroup and H contains P with N ⊴ H and [H:N] a power of p, then [H:NP] is a divisor of [H:N] and [H:P], so must be 1. Notice how the "containment" part of the Sylow theorems is replaced with a "covering" condition that behaves better with the normal structure of the group.

If G is a finite solvable group and X is the class of nilpotent groups, then there is a sort of "Sylow nilpotent subgroup", the X-covering groups or Carter subgroups. They were studied by R.W. Carter who described them as self-normalizing nilpotent subgroups. Like Sylow p-subgroups, there is exactly one conjugacy class of Carter subgroups, and they have some reasonable arithmetic properties. People tried to determine which classes X of groups are such that X-covering groups exist and are unique up to conjugacy. Roughly speaking, this was the dawn of the modern theory of finite soluble groups, with Gaschütz's (et al.) classification of such X as "saturated formations".

This shifts focus away from the subgroup P to the class X. If X is sufficiently nice, then there will be a nicely embedded X-subgroup for any finite group.

Sylow p-subgroups also satisfy a dual condition, they are also X-injectors for the class X of finite p-groups. If X is a class of finite groups, and G is a finite group, then P is an X-injector of G if for every subnormal subgroup N of G, P∩N is a maximal X-subgroup of N. The dual definition of covering group (for X a saturated formation) is that P is an X-covering group iff PN/N is a maximal X-subgroup of G/N for every N ⊴ G. If X is the class of finite nilpotent groups, then X-injectors are called Fischer subgroups and again form a single, well-behaved conjugacy class of subgroups. A Fischer subgroup of a finite soluble group is a nilpotent subgroup that contains every nilpotent subgroup that it normalizes. This is similar to the idea that a Sylow p-subgroup contains every p-group that it normalizes. X such that X-injectors form a unique conjugacy class are called Fitting classes, due to their similarity to Fitting's lemma on subnormal nilpotent subgroups.

If $X$ is a class of finite groups and $G$ is a finite group, then $P$ is an $X$-covering subgroup of $G$ if $P$ is in $X$, and whenever $P \le H \le G, N \unlhd H$, and $H/N$ in $X$, then $PN=H$. In other words, $P$ covers every $X$-factor of $G$. If $X$ is the class of finite $p$-groups, then $X$-covering subgroups of $G$ and Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$ are the same thing. Indeed, if $P$ is an $X$-covering group, and if $H$ is a Sylow $p$-subgroup containing $P$ and $N=1$, then we must have $H=P$. If $P$ is a Sylow $p$-subgroup and $H$ contains $P$ with $N \unlhd H$ and $[H:N]$ a power of $p$, then $[H:NP]$ is a divisor of $[H:N]$ and $[H:P]$, so must be $1$. Notice how the "containment" part of the Sylow theorems is replaced with a "covering" condition that behaves better with the normal structure of the group.

If $G$ is a finite solvable group and $X$ is the class of nilpotent groups, then there is a sort of "Sylow nilpotent subgroup", the $X$-covering groups or Carter subgroups. They were studied by R.W. Carter who described them as self-normalizing nilpotent subgroups. Like Sylow $p$-subgroups, there is exactly one conjugacy class of Carter subgroups, and they have some reasonable arithmetic properties. People tried to determine which classes $X$ of groups are such that $X$-covering groups exist and are unique up to conjugacy. Roughly speaking, this was the dawn of the modern theory of finite soluble groups, with Gaschütz's (et al.) classification of such $X$ as "saturated formations".

This shifts focus away from the subgroup $P$ to the class $X$. If $X$ is sufficiently nice, then there will be a nicely embedded X-subgroup for any finite group.

Sylow $p$-subgroups also satisfy a dual condition, they are also $X$-injectors for the class $X$ of finite $p$-groups. If $X$ is a class of finite groups, and $G$ is a finite group, then $P$ is an $X$-injector of $G$ if for every subnormal subgroup $N$ of $G, P\cap N$ is a maximal $X$-subgroup of $N$. The dual definition of covering group (for $X$ a saturated formation) is that $P$ is an $X$-covering group iff $PN/N$ is a maximal $X$-subgroup of $G/N$ for every $N \unlhd G$. If $X$ is the class of finite nilpotent groups, then $X$-injectors are called Fischer subgroups and again form a single, well-behaved conjugacy class of subgroups. A Fischer subgroup of a finite soluble group is a nilpotent subgroup that contains every nilpotent subgroup that it normalizes. This is similar to the idea that a Sylow $p$-subgroup contains every $p$-group that it normalizes. $X$ such that $X$-injectors form a unique conjugacy class are called Fitting classes, due to their similarity to Fitting's lemma on subnormal nilpotent subgroups.

Source Link
Jack Schmidt
  • 10.7k
  • 1
  • 44
  • 60

Sylow subgroups are an example of a type of object satisfying a sort of universal property. Exploring other objects with similar properties gave birth to the modern theory of finite soluble groups in the 1960s.

If X is a class of finite groups and G is a finite group, then P is an X-covering subgroup of G if P is in X, and whenever P ≤ H ≤ G, N ⊴ H, and H/N in X, then PN=H. In other words, P covers every X-factor of G. If X is the class of finite p-groups, then X-covering subgroups of G and Sylow p-subgroups of G are the same thing. Indeed, if P is an X-covering group, and if H is a Sylow p-subgroup containing P and N=1, then we must have H=P. If P is a Sylow p-subgroup and H contains P with N ⊴ H and [H:N] a power of p, then [H:NP] is a divisor of [H:N] and [H:P], so must be 1. Notice how the "containment" part of the Sylow theorems is replaced with a "covering" condition that behaves better with the normal structure of the group.

If G is a finite solvable group and X is the class of nilpotent groups, then there is a sort of "Sylow nilpotent subgroup", the X-covering groups or Carter subgroups. They were studied by R.W. Carter who described them as self-normalizing nilpotent subgroups. Like Sylow p-subgroups, there is exactly one conjugacy class of Carter subgroups, and they have some reasonable arithmetic properties. People tried to determine which classes X of groups are such that X-covering groups exist and are unique up to conjugacy. Roughly speaking, this was the dawn of the modern theory of finite soluble groups, with Gaschütz's (et al.) classification of such X as "saturated formations".

This shifts focus away from the subgroup P to the class X. If X is sufficiently nice, then there will be a nicely embedded X-subgroup for any finite group.

Sylow p-subgroups also satisfy a dual condition, they are also X-injectors for the class X of finite p-groups. If X is a class of finite groups, and G is a finite group, then P is an X-injector of G if for every subnormal subgroup N of G, P∩N is a maximal X-subgroup of N. The dual definition of covering group (for X a saturated formation) is that P is an X-covering group iff PN/N is a maximal X-subgroup of G/N for every N ⊴ G. If X is the class of finite nilpotent groups, then X-injectors are called Fischer subgroups and again form a single, well-behaved conjugacy class of subgroups. A Fischer subgroup of a finite soluble group is a nilpotent subgroup that contains every nilpotent subgroup that it normalizes. This is similar to the idea that a Sylow p-subgroup contains every p-group that it normalizes. X such that X-injectors form a unique conjugacy class are called Fitting classes, due to their similarity to Fitting's lemma on subnormal nilpotent subgroups.

A very approachable introduction to these ideas is B.F. Wehrfritz's tiny textbook for a Second Course on Group Theory. Some of these ideas are described in Robinson's textbook for a Course in the Theory of Groups, but I believe it spends very little time on general formations. The standard textbook source for formations, especially in the soluble universe, is K. Doerk and T. Hawkes's book Finite Soluble Groups. Doerk&Hawkes explains several of Gaschütz's arithmetically defined Xs, which you might find a good contrast.