Skip to main content
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I asked this question on StackExchangeI asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this questionthis question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened to total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

I asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened to total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

I asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened to total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

edited body
Source Link
user39080
  • 203
  • 2
  • 4

I asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened byto total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

I asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened by total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

I asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened to total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

added 130 characters in body
Source Link
user39080
  • 203
  • 2
  • 4

I asked this question on StackExchangeI asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened by total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

I asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened by total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

I asked this question on StackExchange a few days ago but didn't get any response, so I thought I would try here.

The Wikipedia article on convergence of measures defines three kinds of convergence: total variation, strong, and weak. For weak convergence, a number of equivalent formulations are given, but not for strong or total variation convergence. I have two questions.

  1. Are there some equivalent formulations for those notions of convergence too? In particular, is it true that $\mu_n$ strongly converges to $\mu$ iff $E_{\mu_n} f\to E_\mu f$ for every bounded measurable function $f$? According to an answer to this question, the left-to-right direction holds if strong convergence is strengthened by total variation convergence.

  2. Are there some nice characterizations of these topologies that are not stated in terms of convergent sequences?

added 11 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
user39080
  • 203
  • 2
  • 4
Loading
fixed mistake in title
Link
user39080
  • 203
  • 2
  • 4
Loading
Source Link
user39080
  • 203
  • 2
  • 4
Loading