Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 13, 2020 at 17:45 history edited YCor
edited tags
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Sep 15, 2013 at 14:00 answer added Tobias Schlemmer timeline score: 3
Sep 15, 2013 at 13:21 comment added Boris Novikov Taking into account the comment of Tobias Schlemmer I corrected the answer.
Sep 14, 2013 at 19:52 vote accept Xodarap
Sep 15, 2013 at 16:12
Sep 14, 2013 at 17:15 comment added Tobias Schlemmer Is every right-ordered group with a lattice order already an ordered group? If not there are counterexamples as the implications $x≤1 ⇒ xz≤z$ and similarly for $x≥1$ is a conclusion of being right-ordered. Otherwise it would be sufficient to prove that it is a right-ordered group.
Sep 14, 2013 at 16:42 comment added Boris Novikov I added the answer.
Sep 14, 2013 at 11:56 history edited Xodarap CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 101 characters in body
Sep 14, 2013 at 11:56 comment added Xodarap @Boris: You are right! The group of functions $\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ under addition with pointwise ordering is a counter example to this subset being closed. But the overall group still is lattice ordered. I will update the question.
Sep 13, 2013 at 19:47 comment added Boris Novikov Please explain me: 1) why $\{g\in G: g\not\parallel 1\}$ is a subgroup? 2) why $\{g\in G: g\not\parallel 1\}$ is lattice-ordered? It don't seem following from your condition.
Sep 13, 2013 at 13:13 history edited Xodarap CC BY-SA 3.0
added 28 characters in body
Sep 13, 2013 at 12:30 answer added Boris Novikov timeline score: 2
Sep 13, 2013 at 11:40 review First posts
Sep 13, 2013 at 12:03
Sep 13, 2013 at 11:21 history asked Xodarap CC BY-SA 3.0