Timeline for Do versions of the Nakai-Moishezon and Kleiman criteria hold for Moishezon manifolds, or other 'nice' spaces?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2022 at 18:50 | comment | added | Michael Thaddeus | On the other hand, as Kollár mentions, Kleiman's criterion has been established by Villalobos-Paz for Q-factorial log terminal algebraic spaces (including smooth ones) in characteristic zero: arxiv.org/abs/2105.14630 | |
| Jul 4, 2022 at 18:45 | comment | added | Michael Thaddeus | A 2021 paper of Kollár explains that the Nakai-Moishezon criterion holds, but Kleiman's criterion is not known to hold, for algebraic spaces: arxiv.org/abs/2105.06242 | |
| Sep 13, 2013 at 14:45 | vote | accept | Rhys Davies | ||
| Sep 12, 2013 at 15:23 | answer | added | Jason Starr | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 13:56 | comment | added | naf | Moishezon manifolds are the same as smooth proper algebraic spaces over $\mathbb{C}$. The Nakai-Moishezon criterion is asserted to hold for algebraic spaces in mathoverflow.net/a/4586/519 . | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 12:58 | history | asked | Rhys Davies | CC BY-SA 3.0 |