Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 11, 2013 at 14:45 comment added Joel David Hamkins I agree with that, but I take the question to be about $\Pi_1$ in $V$, rather than $\Pi^1_1$ over $V_\kappa$.
Sep 11, 2013 at 14:44 comment added Monroe Eskew Sorry, I meant $\Pi^1_1$. Witnessing hugeness measures can be found in $V_\kappa$.
Sep 11, 2013 at 14:18 comment added Joel David Hamkins @MonroeEskew, is that really $\Pi_1$? It looks at least $\Pi_2$ to me, since to say that $\delta$ is huge is $\Sigma_2$.
Sep 11, 2013 at 14:15 comment added Monroe Eskew I don't know if you'd count this as a large cardinal, but a very strong $\Pi_1$ property of $\kappa$ is there are stationary many huge cardinals below $\kappa$.
Sep 11, 2013 at 13:13 comment added user36136 So there is no direct relevance between largeness of a large cardinal and its first order expressibility. Do you have any information about this kind of relevance in a different sense?
Sep 11, 2013 at 13:06 comment added Joel David Hamkins I suppose one could take a look through Cantor's upper attic cantorsattic.info/Upper_attic. It seems that $\Pi_1$ doesn't get you very far past Mahloness. Of course, you can get to hyper-Mahlo and somewhat beyond, but I'm not sure that anything larger is $\Pi_1$. Meanwhile, consistency assertions are $\Pi^0_1$, such as $\text{Con}(\text{ZFC}+\text{proper class of supercompact cardinals})$, and these can have very high consistency strength. So if these count as "large cardinal properties", then we shouldn't expect a largest one.
Sep 11, 2013 at 13:01 vote accept CommunityBot
Sep 11, 2013 at 13:01 comment added user36136 Thanks for your elegant answers. What about question (3)?
Sep 11, 2013 at 12:59 vote accept CommunityBot
Sep 11, 2013 at 13:01
Sep 11, 2013 at 12:18 history edited Joel David Hamkins CC BY-SA 3.0
added 317 characters in body
Sep 11, 2013 at 10:49 history answered Joel David Hamkins CC BY-SA 3.0