Timeline for when $g^*$ is invariant under $Ad(G)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2014 at 19:11 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jan 27, 2014 at 19:32 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jan 27, 2014 at 19:33 | |||||
| Sep 8, 2013 at 19:05 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | It is impossible to understand what you are asking from what you wrote, and the remark you point in that book has very little to do with what you wrote! (Kirillov is talking about a $V$ which you do not mention at all...) | |
| Sep 8, 2013 at 11:58 | answer | added | Ben McKay | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 8, 2013 at 11:32 | comment | added | user21574 | Dear Peter Dalakov@ please see page 3 , remark 1, books.google.fr/… | |
| Sep 8, 2013 at 11:22 | comment | added | Peter Dalakov | Not sure what the question is. The group acts on its Lie algebra by the adjoint action. That induces a natural dual action on the dual of the Lie algebra. | |
| Sep 8, 2013 at 11:04 | comment | added | user21574 | Dear Mariano Suárez-Alvarez@ I found this fact without proof in the book of orbit method of kirillov. If you think it is exercise, I can remove it | |
| Sep 8, 2013 at 11:02 | history | edited | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Sep 8, 2013 at 10:54 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | What is $g$ and what is $g^*$? This looks like an exercise, no | |
| Sep 8, 2013 at 10:22 | history | asked | user21574 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |