Timeline for What books approach group theory through transformation/permutation groups?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 14, 2021 at 4:35 | answer | added | Okoyos | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
S Apr 26, 2017 at 18:29 | history | bounty ended | Marcus Johnson | ||
S Apr 26, 2017 at 18:29 | history | notice removed | Marcus Johnson | ||
S Apr 25, 2017 at 13:48 | history | bounty started | Marcus Johnson | ||
S Apr 25, 2017 at 13:48 | history | notice added | Marcus Johnson | Reward existing answer | |
Oct 31, 2013 at 17:52 | answer | added | Hamish Brocklebank | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 29, 2013 at 9:41 | answer | added | Jose Arnaldo Bebita | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 12, 2013 at 22:37 | vote | accept | Marcus Johnson | ||
Oct 29, 2013 at 7:40 | |||||
Sep 7, 2013 at 21:15 | comment | added | Arturo Magidin | I seem to remember that "Groups and Geometry" by Peter Neumann, et al, places a lot of emphasis on groups as "acting groups" (that is, studying groups by what they do rather than what they are). But it's been a while since I looked through it. I'll try to take a look on Monday. | |
Sep 7, 2013 at 17:26 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan♦ | ||
Sep 7, 2013 at 15:12 | review | Close votes | |||
Sep 7, 2013 at 22:47 | |||||
Sep 7, 2013 at 14:43 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 8 | |
Sep 7, 2013 at 14:17 | answer | added | Joshua Grochow | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 7, 2013 at 13:29 | answer | added | Salvatore Siciliano | timeline score: 4 | |
Sep 7, 2013 at 11:54 | answer | added | Boris Novikov | timeline score: 7 | |
Sep 7, 2013 at 11:22 | comment | added | user6976 | @Marius: I do not know about Miles Reed, but most of Arnold's rants about education meant to be just provocative jokes. He also said, if I remember correctly, that most graduates from ENS in France cannot add fractions (because they are too busy studying schemes). | |
Sep 7, 2013 at 11:09 | comment | added | user6976 | @RyanBudney: The question is about an introductory course. | |
Sep 7, 2013 at 10:18 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | The subject of Geometric Group Theory has oodles of books, and they're all from the perspective of group actions / permutation / symmetry groups. Perhaps I'm biased from all my exposure to the 3-manifolds literature but my impression is that almost all modern group theory texts use this perspective as the primary perspective. | |
Sep 7, 2013 at 10:06 | history | asked | Marcus Johnson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |