Timeline for Isometry group of pseudo Riemannian manifold always a Lie group? (Myers-Steenrod)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2023 at 11:59 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added new reference
|
| Feb 9, 2023 at 8:38 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 182 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2023 at 8:32 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added caution about Kobayashi's proof
|
| Jul 8, 2016 at 13:17 | comment | added | iolo | Nevermind, reading further along theorem 5.1 page 22 gives the general case. | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 12:49 | comment | added | iolo | I am struggling to understand the reference. Isn't theorem 4.1 proved only for compact manifolds. (I am a not good at dg, so I may be wrong) | |
| Sep 6, 2013 at 21:51 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Sep 6, 2013 at 11:55 | vote | accept | Stephan Meier | ||
| Sep 6, 2013 at 11:10 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 512 characters in body
|
| Sep 6, 2013 at 11:03 | history | answered | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |