Timeline for Papers better than books?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2013 at 7:29 | history | edited | Charlie Kilo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 66 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Sep 2, 2013 at 3:21 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Ben Webster♦ | ||
| Sep 1, 2013 at 17:18 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | Rota was a master expositor. Not all originals are as well thought out. | |
| Sep 1, 2013 at 15:57 | vote | accept | Charlie Kilo | ||
| Sep 1, 2013 at 12:56 | answer | added | fedja | timeline score: 46 | |
| Sep 1, 2013 at 9:48 | comment | added | user9072 | A somewhat related question mathoverflow.net/questions/28268/do-you-read-the-masters | |
| Sep 1, 2013 at 9:27 | answer | added | Boris Novikov | timeline score: 14 | |
| Sep 1, 2013 at 9:24 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | I would call Stanley's book on combinatorics an amazingly good introduction to Moebius functions... | |
| Sep 1, 2013 at 9:09 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 1, 2013 at 9:15 | |||||
| Sep 1, 2013 at 8:54 | history | asked | Charlie Kilo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |