Timeline for Open Torelli problems
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Aug 29, 2013 at 15:09 | history | edited | HJRW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor spelling correction, organized formatting.
|
| S Aug 29, 2013 at 15:09 | history | suggested | user26791 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor spelling correction, organized formatting.
|
| Aug 29, 2013 at 14:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Aug 29, 2013 at 15:09 | |||||
| Aug 29, 2013 at 12:24 | answer | added | Balazs | timeline score: 10 | |
| Aug 29, 2013 at 12:11 | answer | added | Jason Starr | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 22:07 | comment | added | fabio alves | yes, you're right: i'm interested in local and global Torelli. | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 22:03 | comment | added | Jason Starr | I think you should add some sort of "minimality" condition for your varieties $X$. Obviously the Torelli theorem can fail for a blowing up, and you can "essentially" transform many non-existence conjectures for polarized varieties (e.g., as in Hwang-Mok rigidity) into infinitesimal Torelli conjectures via blowing up. Speaking of which, you should probably also specify whether you are interested in infinitesimal Torelli, local Torelli, global Torelli, generic Torelli, etc. | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 20:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 28, 2013 at 20:55 | |||||
| Aug 28, 2013 at 20:32 | history | asked | fabio alves | CC BY-SA 3.0 |