Timeline for A class of rings related to rings with IBN property [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2013 at 3:23 | history | closed |
David White Andrés E. Caicedo Ryan Budney Todd Trimble Eric Naslund |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Aug 30, 2013 at 7:10 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 30, 2013 at 6:19 | answer | added | user30230 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 29, 2013 at 18:18 | comment | added | user39121 | @MartinBrandenburg I think the class of good rings must be contained in the class of rings with IBN property. | |
| Aug 29, 2013 at 18:16 | comment | added | user39121 | @DavidWhite that was a mistyping. I meant well-known. And as Matrin suggested (2) is the Book. But I am sure that there is nothing in Lam's book concerning to what I am calling good rings. | |
| Aug 29, 2013 at 18:15 | history | edited | user39121 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 27, 2013 at 18:11 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 2, 2013 at 3:23 | |||||
| Aug 27, 2013 at 17:51 | comment | added | David White | The answer must be in Lam, as Martin suggests. Certainly that answers (2), and Lam will give much more general conditions to get IBN. As for (1), what do you mean by "known-known?" | |
| Aug 27, 2013 at 10:01 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | 2. It is well-known that every non-zero left noetherian ring has IBN (Lam's Lectures on modules and rings, Prop. 1.8 and Prop. 1.13) . But how is this connected to your class of good rings? | |
| Aug 27, 2013 at 9:40 | history | edited | user39121 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved
|
| Aug 27, 2013 at 9:24 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 27, 2013 at 9:24 | |||||
| Aug 27, 2013 at 9:04 | history | asked | user39121 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |