Timeline for Regarding understanding differential geometry [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2014 at 6:55 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 10, 2013 at 13:01 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 10, 2013 at 13:37 | |||||
| Sep 9, 2013 at 12:58 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 9, 2013 at 13:05 | |||||
| Aug 24, 2013 at 13:43 | history | closed |
Andrey Rekalo Benoît Kloeckner David White Karl Schwede Misha |
Needs more focus | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 11:55 | answer | added | Paul Siegel | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 10:52 | answer | added | Zurab Silagadze | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 10:43 | comment | added | Ben McKay | I don't think any geometer believes that QFT is really just geometry. Geometers look at QFT with great awe and utter incomprehension. | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 7:22 | comment | added | Chris Gerig | Whoever told you QFT is really just geometry, is definitely not a physicist... | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 6:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 24, 2013 at 13:47 | |||||
| Aug 24, 2013 at 6:36 | comment | added | Ben McKay | The answer depends a great deal on your background, but you might look at Clifford Taubes's book Differential Geometry: Bundles, Connections, Metrics and Curvature. It covers differential geometry with an eye to mathematical physics. | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 6:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 24, 2013 at 6:56 | |||||
| Aug 24, 2013 at 6:35 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
replaced deprecated tag 'topology'
|
| Aug 24, 2013 at 6:34 | comment | added | Michael Albanese | This isn't research level mathematics. You should consider Mathematics on the StackExchange site. There are several questions there which are similar to your request. | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 6:18 | history | asked | user39066 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |