Timeline for Is there a linearly Lindelöf non-Lindelöf $P$-space?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2019 at 21:50 | history | edited | Santi Spadaro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Apr 29, 2019 at 21:42 | history | edited | Santi Spadaro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected grammar
|
| Nov 8, 2017 at 18:23 | comment | added | Santi Spadaro | Is it at least true that every discretely Lindelof P-space is Lindelof? "Discretely Lindelof" means "the closure of every discrete set is Lindelof". It's not too hard to see that every discretely Lindelof space is linearly Lindelof. | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 16:58 | answer | added | Ramiro de la Vega | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 0:41 | comment | added | Ramiro de la Vega | Robson: In Arhangelski-Tkachenko's book, the following is listed as an open problem: "is every linearly Lindelof P-group Lindelof?". I've also seen "Is the product of two linearly Lindelof P-spaces linearly Lindelof?" listed as open, so my guess is that your question is also open, but I'm not sure. | |
| Aug 24, 2013 at 0:36 | comment | added | Ramiro de la Vega | I don't know why people are voting to close this question. Perhaps at least one of the voters could give a reason? | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 22:29 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade |
replaced deprecated tag 'topology'
|
|
| Aug 23, 2013 at 15:16 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 25, 2013 at 3:12 | |||||
| Aug 23, 2013 at 15:02 | comment | added | Stefan Hamcke | math.stackexchange.com/questions/474376/… Please, do not double post your question on MSE and on MO. If you see that your question is still without an answer on one of these sites after a while, you can still post it on the other site. | |
| Aug 23, 2013 at 14:45 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 23, 2013 at 14:47 | |||||
| Aug 23, 2013 at 14:36 | history | edited | Robson Figueiredo |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 23, 2013 at 14:28 | history | asked | Robson Figueiredo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |