Timeline for Evidences on Hartshorne's conjecture? References?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Sep 16, 2014 at 15:12 | comment | added | Lennart Meier | New link: faculty.lagcc.cuny.edu/mmajidi/Research/Dissertation.pdf | |
| Aug 14, 2012 at 10:39 | comment | added | name | The link to Zolbani's thesis doesn't seem to work... | |
| Feb 5, 2010 at 21:03 | history | edited | Hailong Dao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 555 characters in body
|
| Feb 4, 2010 at 21:59 | vote | accept | Fei YE | ||
| Feb 3, 2010 at 22:08 | comment | added | Hailong Dao | In codimension 2 situation, one only need to check that the local ring $R$ at the origin of the cone has depth 2 (since you already assume X is smooth, so $R$ is already an isolated singularity). Thus it is basically $H_m^1(R)=0$. | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 21:55 | comment | added | Fei YE | I checked that question. Although I don't know precisely how $S_2$ condition plays its rule in Hartshorne conjecture, I knew that the vanishing of certain local cohomology groups with $i>0$ implies the splitting condition. By the way, thanks for the reference. | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 21:51 | history | edited | Hailong Dao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 333 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2010 at 17:21 | history | answered | Hailong Dao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |