Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 26, 2013 at 18:10 vote accept John
Aug 26, 2013 at 18:10 vote accept John
Aug 26, 2013 at 18:10
Aug 22, 2013 at 19:19 vote accept John
Aug 26, 2013 at 18:10
Aug 20, 2013 at 23:59 answer added David E Speyer timeline score: 6
Aug 20, 2013 at 16:21 answer added David E Speyer timeline score: 7
Aug 20, 2013 at 15:51 comment added John Totally agree that the notion of being big was not made precise enough. Actually, I still have no idea what is the best definition of the size. I mentioned pairs of commuting operators that obey elliptic curve type relations to emphasize that the subalgebra should be more rich/nontrivial than $p^n, p^{n+1},...$ in the example above. @David, thank you for a nice reference!
Aug 20, 2013 at 15:33 comment added David E Speyer @QiaochuYuan The Krull dimension is $\leq 1$. Let $f$ be any nonscalar element of $A_1$ and let $C(f)$ be the set of $g \in A_1$ that commute $f$. Then $C(f)$ is a finitely generated $k[f]$ module. Since a nontrivial commutative subalgebra must be contained in some $C(f)$, this shows that commutative subalgebras are finite over one dimensional polynomial rings, and hence are Krull dimension one and finitely generated. In fact, more is true: $C(f)$ is, itself, a commutative subalgebra of $A_1$. See Amitsur ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=95305 .
Aug 20, 2013 at 5:00 comment added Qiaochu Yuan This seems like a bad notion of bigness. I think you want something like Krull dimension instead.
Aug 20, 2013 at 0:06 history edited user5810 CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed title
Aug 19, 2013 at 22:44 comment added David E Speyer Dumb comment: You'll want to restrict yourself to maximal subalgebras in order to say anything. Otherwise, for any positive integer $n$, $k[p^{n+1}, p^{n+2}, \cdots, p^{2n}]$ is a commutative subalgebra which can't be generated by fewer than $n$ elements.
Aug 19, 2013 at 22:16 history asked John CC BY-SA 3.0