For interacting fields, if one wants to keep close to what physicists do and steer clear of constructive methods a la Glimm-Jaffe (which isare of course a better choice from the viewpoint of rigor but severely limitslimit the models one may study in itstheir present state of the art), one has to recourse to formal perturbation theory, which means one has to work with formal power series in the coupling constant and Planck's constant. This also means abandoning C$*$-algebras and working with more general *-algebras. Once one accepts this, perturbative renormalization can be dealt with in a rigorous way, using a language close to the one adopted above. See for instance R. Brunetti, M. Dütsch and K. Fredenhagen, "Perturbative algebraic quantum field theory and the renormalization groups", Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (2009) 1541–1599, arXiv:0901.2038 [math-ph].
Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro
- 7.8k
- 1
- 35
- 67
Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro
- 7.8k
- 1
- 35
- 67
Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro
- 7.8k
- 1
- 35
- 67
Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro
- 7.8k
- 1
- 35
- 67
Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro
- 7.8k
- 1
- 35
- 67