Timeline for Discrete subgroups of products of SU(2)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2013 at 10:05 | comment | added | user38651 | Yes that is right, maybe the term "classes" is not appropriate. I meant just that such subgroups are conjugate to either a cyclic one or a binary polyhedral one. As for the Mckay correspondence, thanks for the comment. | |
| Aug 17, 2013 at 15:47 | answer | added | Ian Agol | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 14:32 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | I don't quite understand the term "classes" in the first sentence. Anyway it's unnecessary to mention the McKay correspondence, since the finite subgroups of SU(2) were known much earlier. By now the determination of those finite groups has made its way into elementary sources (such as M. Artin's textbook on algebra. | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 21:36 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
replaced non-applicable tag; corrected typos and minor grammatical mistakes to improve readability
|
| Aug 15, 2013 at 20:19 | answer | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 15, 2013 at 15:11 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 15, 2013 at 15:21 | |||||
| Aug 15, 2013 at 14:55 | history | asked | user38651 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |