Skip to main content
added tag; slight reformatting; corrected typo in title
Source Link
Ricardo Andrade
  • 6.2k
  • 5
  • 42
  • 69

on a caracterisationcharacterisation of the intersection complex

Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type overover a field $k$ of dimension $d$ and $U$ an open dense smooth subscheme.

Let $K\in D_{c}^{b}(X,\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l})$ be such that $K_{U}=\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l}[d]$.

Moreover, we assume that $X=\bigcup\limits_{\alpha\in\Lambda} S_{\alpha}$ where $S_{\alpha}$ is a locally closed subscheme and $\Lambda$ is a set, nonnot necessarily finite, such that :$i_{\alpha}^{*}K=IC_{S_{\alpha}}$.

$i_{\alpha}^{*}K=IC_{S_{\alpha}}$, do Do we have that $K=IC_{X}$?

on a caracterisation of the intersection complex

Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type over a field $k$ of dimension $d$ and $U$ an open dense smooth subscheme.

Let $K\in D_{c}^{b}(X,\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l})$ such that $K_{U}=\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l}[d]$.

Moreover, we assume that $X=\bigcup\limits_{\alpha\in\Lambda} S_{\alpha}$ where $S_{\alpha}$ is a locally closed subscheme and $\Lambda$ a set, non necessarily finite such that :

$i_{\alpha}^{*}K=IC_{S_{\alpha}}$, do we have that $K=IC_{X}$?

on a characterisation of the intersection complex

Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type over a field $k$ of dimension $d$ and $U$ an open dense smooth subscheme.

Let $K\in D_{c}^{b}(X,\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l})$ be such that $K_{U}=\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l}[d]$.

Moreover, we assume that $X=\bigcup\limits_{\alpha\in\Lambda} S_{\alpha}$ where $S_{\alpha}$ is a locally closed subscheme and $\Lambda$ is a set, not necessarily finite, such that $i_{\alpha}^{*}K=IC_{S_{\alpha}}$.

Do we have that $K=IC_{X}$?

modified hypotheses
Source Link
prochet
  • 3.5k
  • 1
  • 13
  • 20

Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type over a field $k$ of dimension $d$ and $U$ an open dense smooth subscheme.

Let $K\in D_{c}^{b}(X,\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l})$ such that $K_{U}=\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l}[d]$.

Moreover, we assume that $X=\bigcup\limits_{\alpha\in\Lambda} S_{\alpha}$ where $S_{\alpha}$ is a locally closed subscheme and $\Lambda$ a set, non necessarily finite such that :

$i_{\alpha}^{*}K=i_{\alpha}^{*}IC_{X}$$i_{\alpha}^{*}K=IC_{S_{\alpha}}$, do we have that $K=IC_{X}$?

Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type over a field $k$ of dimension $d$ and $U$ an open dense smooth subscheme.

Let $K\in D_{c}^{b}(X,\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l})$ such that $K_{U}=\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l}[d]$.

Moreover, we assume that $X=\bigcup\limits_{\alpha\in\Lambda} S_{\alpha}$ where $S_{\alpha}$ is a locally closed subscheme and $\Lambda$ a set, non necessarily finite such that :

$i_{\alpha}^{*}K=i_{\alpha}^{*}IC_{X}$, do we have that $K=IC_{X}$?

Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type over a field $k$ of dimension $d$ and $U$ an open dense smooth subscheme.

Let $K\in D_{c}^{b}(X,\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l})$ such that $K_{U}=\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l}[d]$.

Moreover, we assume that $X=\bigcup\limits_{\alpha\in\Lambda} S_{\alpha}$ where $S_{\alpha}$ is a locally closed subscheme and $\Lambda$ a set, non necessarily finite such that :

$i_{\alpha}^{*}K=IC_{S_{\alpha}}$, do we have that $K=IC_{X}$?

Source Link
prochet
  • 3.5k
  • 1
  • 13
  • 20

on a caracterisation of the intersection complex

Let $X$ be an integral scheme of finite type over a field $k$ of dimension $d$ and $U$ an open dense smooth subscheme.

Let $K\in D_{c}^{b}(X,\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l})$ such that $K_{U}=\bar{\mathbb{Q}}_{l}[d]$.

Moreover, we assume that $X=\bigcup\limits_{\alpha\in\Lambda} S_{\alpha}$ where $S_{\alpha}$ is a locally closed subscheme and $\Lambda$ a set, non necessarily finite such that :

$i_{\alpha}^{*}K=i_{\alpha}^{*}IC_{X}$, do we have that $K=IC_{X}$?