Timeline for Reference for hyperelliptic curves
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jan 10, 2015 at 20:51 | history | suggested | Tadashi |
Added relevant tag
|
|
| Jan 10, 2015 at 20:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 10, 2015 at 20:51 | |||||
| Aug 16, 2013 at 1:54 | answer | added | rfauffar | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 1:11 | answer | added | roy smith | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 14, 2013 at 3:08 | answer | added | Felipe Voloch | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 14, 2013 at 2:48 | comment | added | Francois Ziegler | @AlexandreEremenko Yes it is Weil who calls it "severely dehumanized", in the above-linked review. | |
| Aug 14, 2013 at 2:24 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | Mumford's Tata lectures on theta has a chapter on hyperelliptic curves. (I remember someone called Chevalley's book "inhuman". I tend to agree with this:-) | |
| Aug 14, 2013 at 2:07 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @FelipeVoloch "a tour de force" is usually not an indication of "a good reference". | |
| Aug 13, 2013 at 22:31 | comment | added | Felipe Voloch | According to Weil (projecteuclid.org/…) Ch IV, §9 of Chevalley's book "Introduction to the theory of algebraic functions of one variable", is a "tour de force". | |
| Aug 13, 2013 at 22:15 | history | asked | expmat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |