Timeline for Iterated Lefschetz numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2013 at 0:40 | vote | accept | user38496 | ||
| Aug 23, 2013 at 19:44 | history | edited | Ian Agol |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 22, 2013 at 20:57 | answer | added | Ian Agol | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 12, 2013 at 5:17 | comment | added | user38496 | @IanAgol This is my intuition but I want to show that the integer $m$ depends only on (g,n) and so it seems to me a universal gap between the first and second eigenvalues modulus is necessary. | |
| Aug 12, 2013 at 4:52 | comment | added | Ian Agol | For any $(g,n)$, there is a universal lower bound on $|\lambda|>1$ - does that imply what you want? | |
| Aug 12, 2013 at 3:45 | comment | added | user38496 | @IgorRivin added the definition for the case being considered. | |
| Aug 12, 2013 at 3:43 | history | edited | user38496 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 133 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2013 at 3:04 | comment | added | Vidit Nanda | @IgorRivin The Lefschetz number is quite standard, it is defined to be the alternating sum over dimension of the trace of the induced map on homology. See mathworld.wolfram.com/LefschetzNumber.html for instance. | |
| Aug 11, 2013 at 23:16 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | You might want to define the Lefschetz number... | |
| Aug 11, 2013 at 22:38 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 11, 2013 at 22:54 | |||||
| Aug 11, 2013 at 22:20 | history | asked | user38496 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |